How good is the PCR for diagnosing osteoarticular infection?

Article

Use of a broad-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test increases identification of Kingella kingae in osteoarticular infections, according to the findings of a newly published study. The organism has been described as a pathogen in osteoarticular infections in children, but the extent of its role has been unclear because it is difficult to grow in culture. Investigators conducted a study of 171 children who had been admitted to a pediatric hospital in France with suspected osteoarticular infection during a three-year period. Their median age was 17.9 months.

Culture was positive in 64 children, yielding K kingae in nine. Of 107 culture-negative specimens tested by 16S ribosomal DNA PCR, 15 were positive-all for Kingella. K kingae was therefore responsible for 30% of osteoarticular infections; Staphylococcus aureus (identified by culture) was the culprit in 38%. Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both the 24 children with K kingae osteoarticular infection diagnosed by culture and the 15 whose infection was diagnosed by PCR.

The investigators noted that, although imaging-plain radiography, ultrasonography, bone scanning, and magnetic resonance imaging-produced useful diagnostic information, findings from those studies were nonspecific (Verdier I et al: Pediatr Infect Dis J 2005;24:692).

Recent Videos
cUTI Roundtable: Discussing and diagnosing these difficult infections
Courtney Nelson, MD
Tina Tan, MD, FAAP, FIDSA, FPIDS, editor in chief, Contemporary Pediatrics, professor of pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, pediatric infectious diseases attending, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Related Content
© 2024 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.