OR WAIT null SECS
Poisons have been a threat to the health and well-being of humankind for millennia. Given the ubiquitous nature of potential poisons, exposure to a toxin should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with unexplained illnesses or unusual presentations.
Poisons have been a threat to the health and well-being of humankind for millennia. The word toxin is derived from the ancient Greek word toxikon, meaning "poison into which arrowheads are dipped" (in reference to Hercules' use of arrows dipped in the venom of the Hydra to slay the centaur Nessus).
Over the ages, poisons have played a considerable role in human affairs. Whether speaking of Socrates and his cup of hemlock, of those condemned to the "penalty of the peach" (administration of peach pits that contain amygdalin, which is metabolized to cyanide), or of the gas chamber (sulfuric acid mixed with sodium cyanide pellets in an enclosed area), poisons have been employed over the ages as an effective means of execution.
The use of toxins in a less than judicial role litters the course of human history as well. Arsenic, referred to as the poudre de succession (the powder of succession), helped ambitious princes secure thrones. Poisoning as a means of political gain is even evident in the recent dioxin poisoning of Victor Ushenko, the newly elected president of Ukraine. Poisons have also been employed throughout history as weapons of war and terror. Hannibal's sailors catapulted pots full of venomous snakes onto the decks of the opposing fleet. Members of the Aum Shinrikyo cult killed fellow countrymen after releasing sarin gas in a Matsumoto neighborhood and on Tokyo subway trains in 1994 and 1995, respectively. And certainly in the post-9/11 environment, chemicals employed as weapons of mass destruction and terror remain a concern of the ongoing national security debate.
But to focus solely on the more deceitful aspects of poisons is to miss the broader scope of their influence in the lives of our patients. We live in a world of toxins and potential toxins, and thus we are often just a misstep away from a toxic exposure and its consequences. Even that which is meant to cure can kill. As Paracelsus, the 16th-century German-Swiss physician and alchemist, said, all substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy. The truth in his words echoes today: exposure to the wrong dose of a medication (whether accidental or not) remains a common form of toxic exposure.
Medications are only one example of potential toxins in the home. Household cleaners and other chemicals are common sources of intentional and unintentional poisoning. Chemicals used to improve our lives or environment--such as herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and hydrocarbon fuels used in agriculture or industry--are potentially harmful if improperly used.
From the massive toxic gas release from Mount Vesuvius in ad 79 to the release of methyl isocyanate gas in one of the greatest civilian toxic disasters in modern history in Bhopal, India, in 1984, natural or industrial toxic releases remain a potential threat to health.1-4 Given the ubiquitous nature of potential poisons, exposure to a toxin should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with unexplained illnesses or unusual presentations.
The American Association of Poison Control Centers--whose 62 participating poison centers service the population of the 50 states and the District of Columbia--has compiled poisoning data since 1983 and created the Toxic Exposure Surveillance System (TESS). According to the TESS 2004 annual report, US poison centers reported a total of 2,438,644 human exposure cases. Sixty-five percent of reported exposures were in children; of those pediatric exposures, 51.3% of all exposures occurred in children younger than 6 years. Patients younger than 13 years were predominantly male. However, this gender predominance was reversed in teenagers and adults.
Most toxic exposures were unintentional (84.1%) and involved a single toxic substance (91.4%). Most exposures occurred at the patient's residence or another residence (89.7% and 3%, respectively). Ingestions (76.8%) were by far the most common route of exposure; dermal exposure and inhalation ranked second and third (7.5% and 5.9%, respectively).
Most patients were treated at the site of exposure and received only poison center support. Some were treated and subsequently released from a health care facility (11.6%). Only 6.8% were admitted to a health care facility for further examination and treatment.5
THE STARTING POINT: A GOOD HISTORY
You will have taken the first step in correctly diagnosing a toxicologic illness or injury by entertaining that possibility in your differential diagnosis. A good history--one that concentrates on uncovering possible toxic exposure--provides you with the means to zero in on the offending agent or agents and focus your physical examination.
Start with the usual: question the patient, parents, and/or others involved in the patient's care to develop a complete understanding of the constellation of acute complaints. Ask specifically about any temporal associations with these complaints. Establish a timeline of your patient's complaints.
Next, determine whether anyone in the patient's family or school, or among their other regular contacts is experiencing the same or similar symptoms.
Ask the parents about any medications the child may be taking (both prescription and over-the-counter).
What vitamins or nutritional supplements does the patient take?
Does the patient take any herbal or nontraditional remedies?
Do not stop with the patient's medications: who else's medications are reasonably available to the patient in his or her home environment?
Could the patient be ingesting (inadvertently or intentionally) a family member's medications, supplements, or remedies?
Does the patient consume any unusual foods that might have a toxic effect, either acutely or of a more cumulative nature?
Does the patient consume any natural or organic foodstuffs?
Is there any reason to suspect that the patient may be consuming any food that may be contaminated with herbicides, pesticides, or other toxic chemicals?
Ask the parents about the particulars of the patient's home. The age and type of structure can provide valuable clues about materials that might reasonably be found in that residence. For example, was the patient's home built before the 1978 US ban on lead in new paints? If so, the home has a greater likelihood of containing lead-based paints.6
What type of heating and cooling devices are used in the home?
Does the home have an old furnace in disrepair that potentially leaks carbon monoxide throughout the house?
What household chemicals are stored or used in the house or outlying structures?
Does the patient have access to these stored chemicals?
Water source history
Is the patient's home supplied by a city water system or by a separate, well-based system?
If the source is a large city water system, is there reason to suspect contamination--perhaps with hydrocarbons or other industrial chemicals?
If well water is the source, is there reason to suspect agricultural runoff, herbicides, or pesticides as possible contamination?
Where does the patient attend school? How long has he been attending that school?
What material(s) does the patient handle at work or school?
Are there any materials or procedures that require specific safety precautions or equipment? If so, does the patient use appropriate personal protective equipment?
Is the patient exposed to any confined or poorly ventilated spaces throughout the day?
Is there any ongoing or recent construction or repairs to the patient's school?
Are there centers of agriculture or industry nearby?
Does the patient engage in any hobbies or leisure activities that might present an increased risk of toxic exposure?
Our patients lead interesting and complex lives. When you suspect a possible toxic cause for their presenting complaints, you must try to develop a comprehensive picture of the world in which they live. A thorough and detailed history that explores all potential sources of toxic exposures is perhaps the most important element of making an accurate diagnosis of poisoning.
THE PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
A head-to-toe examination should be performed on every patient who presents with multiple acute complaints--especially those that are vague or nonfocal. Focus on vital signs and organ systems often affected by potential toxins in an effort to assess your patient for a toxicologic syndrome, or "toxidrome" (listed in the Table).
Look at your patient globally. Does he appear acutely ill or uncomfortable? Does the general appearance fit with your review of vital signs? Is he especially warm or cool?
Do the vital signs represent a pattern consistent with any common toxidrome (anticholinergic, sympathomimetic, or other)?
Dermatologic findings (including mucous membranes): Is the patient dry or diaphoretic? Flushed or pale? Is he cyanotic? Are there any rashes or discrete lesions evident? Is the patient salivating? Lacrimating? Is rhinorrhea present?
Neurologic findings: Is there altered mental status, nystagmus, or myoclonus? Is there hyper- or hyporeflexia?
Ophthalmologic signs: Is there miosis or mydriasis? Are the pupils equal, round, and reactive to light?
GI signs: Are bowel sounds hyperactive or reduced? Is there evidence of incontinence?
Genitourinary signs: Can you palpate the bladder (consistent with urinary retention)? Is there evidence of incontinence?
LABORATORY/ DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
The following are reasonably available to the office-based provider:
A basic metabolic panel.
Complete blood cell (CBC) count.
Teen-Aged Boy With "Flu-Like" Symptoms
A15-year-old boy, who has been your patient for over 6 years, comes to your office with an approximately 6- to 7-day history of what he describes as flu-like symptoms. These are characterized predominantly by generalized fatigue and malaise with nausea and vomiting (1 or 2 episodes of nonbloody, nonbilious emesis per day). The patient attributes these symptoms to the especially cold weather over the past couple of weeks. He denies any chest pain, palpitations, or shortness of breath. There is no cough, nasal discharge, sinus pressure, or congestion. He denies any diarrhea or additional GI symptoms. He denies dysuria and other genitourinary complaints.
He describes a generalized difficulty in thinking and concentrating on tasks at home and at school over the past few days. He describes no focal neurologic deficits, but he has had mild intermittent headaches during this time without neck stiffness, photophobia, or additional complaints that he can attribute to these headaches. His symptoms are worse in the morning and then improve throughout the day or during periods away from home.
The patient has no past medical history and until the past week or so his family has been quite healthy. He does not smoke or drink, and he denies illicit drug use. He lives with his mother, father, and younger sister--all of whom have been experiencing similar symptoms during the same period.
The patient says that he lives in a home built in the mid-1980s. He does not know the particulars or current condition of the heating and air conditioning systems, but he knows that his furnace burns oil. The home is supplied with city water. The family has not received notification of any water contamination issues. He has not noticed any appreciable disruption in the water supplied to his home, nor any alteration in odor, color, or clarity.
The patient's home is located within a large area zoned for residential use. He can think of no agricultural or industrial sites within at least 10 miles, and no fumes or odors from industry have been noticed around his home. There are no railways, highways, or waterways nearby, and no reports of recent accidents involving hazardous materials transportation vehicles near his home or school.
The patient takes no medications, vitamins, nutritional supplements, or nontraditional remedies. The patient's parents each take a daily multivitamin. The patient eats a variety of fruits and vegetables purchased at a local supermarket, which are washed thoroughly before preparation.
After school, the patient works as a courier in a large office building that was built in the past 5 years. He attends a newly constructed local high school. There is no ongoing construction or renovation. Various classmates have experienced symptoms that are similar to the patient's own; these are generally attributed to "that crud going around the school this time of year."
The patient's hobbies include tennis and card games with friends at their homes. He does not spend any appreciable time in a toolshed, basement, or other enclosed work area for hobbies or entertainment. He does help his parents with yard maintenance projects during the summer, including applications of various pesticides and herbicides.
Physical examination findings
Vital signs: Oral temperature 98.9ºF (37.2ºC); heart rate, 102 beats per minute; blood pressure, 138/86 mm Hg; respiration rate, 18 breaths per minute; oxygen saturation, 99% on ambient air.
General: Mildly ill appearing, but alert and cooperative.
HEENT: Pupils equal, round, and reactive at 4 mm bilaterally. Anicteric sclerae without conjunctival injection or lacrimation. No rhinorrhea or nasal drainage. No oropharyngeal erythema. Moist mucosal membranes without excessive salivation or lymphadenopathy.
Dermatologic: Warm, anicteric skin with normal turgor, and without flushing, diaphoresis, pallor, piloerection, or cyanosis. No rashes or discrete lesions.
Pulmonary: Lungs clear to auscultation bilaterally.
Cardiovascular: Tachycardia, though regular rhythm. No murmurs, rubs, gallops. Point of maximum intensity is nondisplaced.
Abdomen: Soft, nontender, nondistended, no rebound or guarding. Normoactive bowel sounds auscultated in 4 quadrants. No palpable bladder.
Extremities: No clubbing, cyanosis, or edema. Pulses symmetric and within normal limits. No lymphadenopathy, including in groin and axilla.
Neurologic: Oriented to person, place, and time. Motor and sensory examination symmetric and within normal limits bilaterally. Normoreflexive. No asterixis or evidence of myoclonus. Results of Romberg and Babinsky tests negative.
Results of the basic metabolic panel are as follows:
Sodium: 141 mmol/L
Chloride: 105 mmol/L
Blood urea nitrogen: 12 mg/dL
Glucose: 89 mg/dL
Potassium: 4 mmol/L
Carbon dioxide: 21 mEq/L
Creatinine: 0.8 mg/dL
Calcium: 9 mg/dL
Anion gap: 15
Results of the CBC count are as follows:
White blood cells: 8000/µL
Hemoglobin: 14.2 g/dL
Hematocrit: 42.4 mL/100 mL
Results of electrocardiography are as follows:
No ST abnormalities
The differential diagnosis includes an upper respiratory tract infection, a viral syndrome, and carbon monoxide poisoning.
This patient presents with a history, physical findings, and diagnostic test results that strongly suggest carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. Symptoms of CO poisoning exist on a broad spectrum. Manifestations of mild poisoning include fatigue, malaise, flu-like symptoms, nausea/vomiting, cognitive difficulty (manifested as decreased concentration, memory deficits, and a generalized difficulty in thinking), and emotional lability.7 Moderate symptoms include dizziness, paresthesias, weakness, lethargy, and somnolence. Severe symptoms include loss of consciousness, seizures, stroke, coma, mildly to severely mottled skin, and cardiopulmonary collapse.
While aspects of this patient's history and physical examination findings are consistent with a viral syndrome, piecing together the clinical picture with an eye toward a toxicologic cause suggests mild CO poisoning. This patient presented during cold weather with about a 1-week history of generalized fatigue and malaise associated with occasional nausea and vomiting with intermittent headaches. He also complains of difficulty in concentrating over the past few days. There are no additional focal complaints. His family members have had similar symptoms during this period. Symptoms are worse in the morning (after having slept throughout the night with this inhalational toxic exposure) and improve during the day and outside the house (when the patient is removed from the exposure). The patient's toxicologic history is benign, aside from his lack of understanding as to the state of repair and subsequent danger of his oil-burning furnace.
The patient is afebrile and has low-grade tachycardia. He is neither hypertensive nor hypotensive. He does not display tachypnea, nor is he hypoxic according to the pulse oximeter. (Note: pulse oximetry does not distinguish between carboxyhemoglobin and oxyhemoglobin, and thus provides falsely high arterial oxygen saturation readings in CO poisoning.)
Neither his vital signs nor his physical examination results are consistent with a common toxidrome. Aside from tachycardia and the patient's mildly ill appearance, physical findings are within normal limits. A basic metabolic panel reveals only a very mild anion gap acidosis from tissue hypoxia (consistent with mild CO poisoning). The CBC count and urinalysis results are within normal limits. The ECG demonstrates only a sinus tachycardia, without further abnormalities.
What is the appropriate treatment (further diagnostic studies and therapy) for this patient? The first step is immediate provision of supplemental oxygen--preferably 100% oxygen via a non-rebreather mask. Because this patient presented at your office, disposition should be to the nearest emergency department (ED). Arrange transport via emergency medical services (EMS), with EMS to provide supplemental oxygen en route.
Notify the ED of the patient's impending arrival. Tell them that CO poisoning is suspected, and that immediate diagnosis via measurement of the carboxyhemoglobin level and further medical management are critical. Call your poison control center to assist you in coordinating care for your patient.
Also, alert the patient's family about the suspected toxic exposure. Tell them of the need to immediately remove themselves from the home (and thus from the toxic source) and to join the patient in the ED for treatment. Notify the appropriate authorities to go to the residence to test for carbon monoxide.8,9
Poisons and potential toxic exposures are a constant part of everyday life. Consider a toxicologic cause when you evaluate any patient's complaints. In particular, be sure to consider a toxicologic cause in any previously healthy patient with an abrupt onset of illness, multiorgan system illnesses, or recurrent signs or symptoms of illness without evident cause.
Treatment of the poisoned patient depends on hemodynamic stability, the specific or suspected toxin involved, and the nature and severity of symptoms. If the patient is hemodynamically unstable or presents with altered mental status or other profound symptoms, immediate transport via EMS to the nearest ED is crucial for further monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment. Conversely, the patient who is asymptomatic or who displays only mild symptoms with stable vital signs may realistically be allowed to return home--assuming the suspected toxic exposure has been identified and discontinuation of further exposure has been ensured. However, the astute physician must first determine that the toxic exposure does not include the potential for delayed onset of symptoms.
Please do not hesitate to call your regional poison control center at 800-222-1222 whenever you suspect a toxic exposure.
1. Newman C. 12 Toxic tales.
2005;5:8, 19, 24.
Forum: May 2005/Pick Your Poison.
3. Goldfrank LR, Flomenbaum NE, Lewin NA, et al. Historical principles and perspectives. In: Goldfrank LR, ed.
Goldfrank's Toxicologic Emergencies.
7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2002:1-2, 5-6.
4. Olson KB. Aum Shinrikyo: once and future threat?
Emerg Infect Dis.
1999;5:513-516. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/EID/vol5no4/ olson.htm. Accessed March 1, 2006.
5. Watson WA, Litovitz TL, Rodgers GC Jr, et al. 2004 Annual report of the American Association of Poison Control Centers Toxic Exposure Surveillance System.
Am J Emerg Med.
6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Eliminating Childhood Lead Poisoning: A Federal Strategy Targeting Lead Paint Hazards.
President's Task Force on Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks to Children. February 2000:14.
7. Tabarak Qureshi S, Mahajan P. Carbon monoxide poisoning: clues to unmasking the great masquerader.
8. American Academy of Family Physicians Practice Management. CLIA waived and PPM tests defined. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/x2255.xml. Accessed March 1, 2006.
9. Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski J, eds. Environmental injuries. In:
Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide.
6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2004:1239-1241.