Contemporary Pediatrics:
How was the study designed and where was the information pulled? How was ED readiness measured?
Jenkins:
This cohort study was a secondary analysis of data that we obtained from 11 states, including almost 600 EDs, through the state Departments of Health. We used the weighted Pediatric Readiness Score to provide a measure of readiness for each ED. That score was based on a 2013 survey that was conducted nationally. We performed risk-adjusted analyses of mortality for each cohort of children (i.e., injury and medical), using the readiness score and race and ethnicity as the primary exposure variables.
Contemporary Pediatrics:
Related to race and ethnicity, what associations with ED readiness were observed?
Jenkins:
In terms of survival, we found that children of all races benefitted from increased ED pediatric readiness. That finding applied to both children with traumatic injuries and those with acute medical emergencies. Among the latter group, we also found that increased readiness was associated with a significant decrease in racial and ethnic disparities. In fact, we estimate that if we increased the readiness of all hospitals to the highest level, we would see a 3-fold decrease in the disparity between Black and White children.
Contemporary Pediatrics:
Finally, what conclusions were made because of the study, and what are the biggest takeaways when it comes to attempting to eliminate these disparities?
Jenkins:
Increased ED pediatric readiness is associated with both the improved survival of all children and increased health equity. Organizations dedicated to increasing ED pediatric readiness should consider formal integration of a health equity platform into efforts to improve pediatric emergency care.
Reference:
Jenkins PC, Lin A, Ames SG, et al. Emergency department pediatric readiness and disparities in mortality based on race and ethnicity. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(9):e2332160. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.32160