No level of exposure to lead is safe and predicting exposure can be difficult. An investigation assesses the effectiveness of a machine learning model in predicting lead exposure.
There is no level of lead exposure that is without risk. Exposure to lead in childhood leads to irreversible neurodevelopmental deficits, which sets children up for a lifetime of suboptimal outcomes. Unfortunately, lead exposure prevention is only secondary in nature. An investigation in JAMA Network Open assesses whether a machine learning model was better than regression in predicting childhood lead poisoning.1
Researchers ran a prognostic study that used data from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program linked to the Chicago Department of Public Health. The participants came from a development cohort of children and a validation WIC cohort. Blood lead levels were assessed until December 2018.
There were 6812 children in the WIC validation cohort, which was comprised of mostly Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black children. The median year for house construction in the cohort was 1919. The machine learning prediction model’s area under the curve was 0.69, whereas the logistic regression’s area under the curve was 0.64 (difference, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02-0.08). When the models were used to predict the 5% of children who were at the highest risk of having elevated blood lead levels, the machine learning model had a positive predictive value of 15.5% and the regression had a predictive value of 7.8% (difference, 7.7%; 95% CI, 3.7%-11.3%). In this same group, the sensitivity was 16.2% for machine learning and 8.1% for the regression (difference, 8.1%; 95% CI, 3.9%-11.7%) and the specificity was 95.5% and 95.1%, respectively (difference, 0.4%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.7%)
The investigators concluded that the machine learning model was better at predicting childhood lead poisoning than regression. The machine learning was particularly good at identifying children who were at the highest risk of being exposed to lead. The findings are particularly important because many agencies have limited resources to proactively prevent lead exposure. The study’s results indicate that predicting lead exposure is difficult, but utilizing the machine learning model could help agencies use proactive measures to prevent exposure among children who are at the greatest risk.
Reference
1. Potash E, Ghani R, Walsh J, et al. Validation of a machine learning model to predict childhood lead poisoning. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9):e2012734. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12734
Fluoxetine helps refractory nocturnal enuresis but not for long
March 29th 2023A 12-week study in Egypt of the efficacy of fluoxetine (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) in children with treatment-refractory nocturnal enuresis (NE) found that though the treatment achieved a good initial response, it was not sustainable.
Meet the Board: Vivian P. Hernandez-Trujillo, MD, FAAP, FAAAAI, FACAAI
May 20th 2022Contemporary Pediatrics sat down with one of our newest editorial advisory board members: Vivian P. Hernandez-Trujillo, MD, FAAP, FAAAAI, FACAAI to discuss what led to her career in medicine and what she thinks the future holds for pediatrics.
Are some patients predisposed to avascular necrosis after hip surgery?
March 14th 2023Although avascular necrosis (AVN) is believed to be an iatrogenic complication following treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip, an investigation in China found 2 characteristics associated with the condition: the likelihood of AVN increases with both the grade of dislocation and of underdevelopment of the ossific nucleus.
Meet the board: Jessica L. Peck, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC, CNE, CNL, FAANP, FAAN
April 22nd 2022In the latest episode of our podcast series, Jessica L. Peck, DNP, APRN, CPNP-PC, CNE, CNL, FAANP, FAAN shares why she got into medicine, the myths of pediatric, and what the future may hold for the specialty.