- American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN)
- Enrolled in Medicaid or the Indian Health Service (IHS) or uninsured
- Ever received at least 1 vaccination at an IHS-operated center, Tribal health center, or urban Indian health care facility
According to the study authors, percentage point differences in vaccination coverage among VFC-eligible and non-VFC-eligible children were calculated using Z-tests to evaluate the gap in coverage by program eligibility status. Estimates of vaccination coverage with the previously-mentioned vaccines were stratified by the child's race and ethnicity, health insurance status, urbanicity, and household income.1
Fifty-two percent of children aged 19 to 35 months who were born between 2011 and 2020 were VFC eligible. Of those born in 2020, 93.4% were Medicaid-insured, 7.4% were AI/AN, 43.7% lived in households with income below the federal poverty level, and 48.1% lived in a metropolitan statistical area (MSA) principal city. From 2011 to 2020, the proportion of VFC-eligible children who were uninsured decreased from 8.1% to 3.1%, respectively.1
From 2011 to 2020, among VFC-eligible children, coverage at 24 months was considered stable for ≥1 MMR dose, between 88.0% and 89.9%. Coverage for the combined 7-vaccine series was 61.4% to 65.3%. By 8 months of age, vaccination coverage was 64.8% to 71.1% and increased by an average of 0.7 percentage points annually.1
For children born in 2020, coverage was lower among each vaccination group among VFC-eligible children compared to non-VFC-eligible children. Coverage for ≥1 MMR dose was 3.8 percentage points lower, 2 to 3 doses of rotavirus vaccine was 11.5 percentage points lower, and the combined 7-series vaccination was 13.8 points lower among VFC-eligible than among non–VFC-eligible children, respectively.1
Of children born in 2020, all 3 vaccination coverage measures were lower among VFC-eligible children compared to non-VFC-eligible children who were1:
- White (−17.9 to −6.2 percentage points)
- Living at or above the poverty level (−11.2 to −4.6 percentage points)
- Living in MSA principal cities (−12.8 to −3.3 percentage points) and MSA nonprincipal cities (−15.4 to −4.1 percentage points)
Conclusion
"Although the VFC program has played a vital role in increasing and maintaining high levels of childhood vaccination coverage for 30 years, gaps remain," stated the authors. "Enhanced efforts must ensure that parents and guardians of VFC-eligible children are aware of, have confidence in, and are able to obtain all recommended vaccines for their children.
References:
- Vital Signs: Trends and Disparities in Childhood Vaccination Coverage by Vaccines for Children Program Eligibility — National Immunization Survey-Child, United States, 2012–2022. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. August 13, 2024. Accessed August 14, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/wr/mm7333e1.htm
- About the Vaccines for Children (VFC) program. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Updated June 26, 20204. Accessed August 14, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines-for-children/about/index.html