Jared Kaltwasser

Previously infected people who are vaccinated have the strongest protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2, according to a new study, but the data also show that protection from vaccination and natural infection wanes significantly over time.

, helps quantify the benefits of natural immunity and vaccination

It has long been known that natural immunity from severe acute respiratory syndrome wanes over time, and that vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 require 

 and may be less effective against new strains of the virus, though they appear to continue to provide robust protection against severe disease.

What is less clear, according to corresponding author Yair Goldberg, PhD, of the Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, and colleagues, is how protection conferred by the combination of natural immunity and vaccination changes over time.

The investigators decided to use data from the Israeli Health Ministry’s databases to track immunity over time among groups with different immunity statuses. The groups included unvaccinated people with a history of infection, vaccinated people with a history of infection, and vaccinated people who had no history of infection (and thus no natural immunity). The authors used data from August and September 2021, a period of time when the delta SARS-CoV-2 variant was predominant in Israel.

Data from more than 5.7 million people was included in the study. Infection risk was translated into rates of infection per 100,000 person-days, adjusted for confounding variables. The vaccine used in the analysis was the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine.

The data showed a waning over time in all protection categories, but it differed based on infection history and vaccination status. Unvaccinated people with a history of infection were re-infected at a rate of 10.5 cases per 100,000 person-days 4-6 months following their initial infection. Over time, however, their natural immunity waned. Among unvaccinated people whose first infection was at least a year earlier, the rate of infection was 30.2 cases per 100,000 person-days.

Rates were considerably lower among people with a history of infection who had received a single vaccine dose. For them, the rate of reinfection was just 3.7 cases per 100,000 person-days within the first 2 months following vaccination. Once 6 months had passed following vaccination, the rate rose to 11.6 cases per 100,000 person-days.

Lastly, among people with no history of infection but who had received 2 vaccine doses, case rates in the first 2 months following vaccination were 21.1 per 100,000 person-days. After the 6-month post-vaccination mark, case rates jumped to 88.9 cases per 100,000 person-days.

“In findings that were consistent with those of other studies, after several months, persons with hybrid immunity were better protected against reinfection than uninfected persons who had previously received two doses of vaccine (the two-dose cohort,” Goldberg and colleagues wrote. “Furthermore, we found that a single dose of the vaccine administered to a previously infected person or a booster dose administered to an uninfected person who had received two doses of vaccine restored the level of protection to the level in the early months after recovery or vaccination.”

Though their study found clear benefits to vaccination, the authors noted that such data is inherently confounded by changes to the SARS-CoV-2 virus itself; the data here may not necessarily apply the same way to future variants, they noted.

The authors also noted that their data are based on cases confirmed by PCR testing. At the time, the Israeli government’s policy called for mandatory PCR testing for all people who came in contact with an infected person. However, they said the rate of PCR testing tended to be lower in patients who had recovered from infection but were unvaccinated, and thus it is possible the study over-estimated the level of protection in that cohort.

Still, the investigators said the data tell a story both about the protection conferred by infection and vaccination, one that should be heeded by 

policymakers as they consider future vaccination policies

“An understanding of the rates of waning immunity after immunity-conferring events is important for policy making regarding the need for and the timing of additional vaccine doses,” they concluded.

Originally published on our sister brand, 

Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bar-On YM, et al. Protection and Waning of Natural and Hybrid Immunity to SARS-CoV-2. 

. 2022;386(23):2201-2212. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2118946

Articles

Patients with a history of infection who were also vaccinated had the strongest protection, the data showed.

Jared Kaltwasser

Articles

Against COVID-19, both natural and vaccination-mediated protection wane over time