In the ED, he was febrile, tachycardic, and hypoxemic. His examination was notable for decreased breath sounds, worse over the left lower lobe, without wheezing or increased work of breathing. Lab workup was remarkable only for a C-reactive protein of 4 mg/dL. The chest x-ray showed focal left lower lobe and left lingular lobe airspace disease (Figure 3).
He was started on ampicillin-sulbactam intravenously and oxygen by nasal cannula. Over the next 24 hours, respiratory support was escalated to high-flow nasal cannula for increasing work of breathing and worsening hypoxemia. The chest x-ray was unchanged, and the chest ultrasound demonstrated a focal left lower lobe consolidation and trace left pleural effusion. Due to increasing oxygen needs and work of breathing, he was transferred to the PICU.
His physical examination on arrival at the PICU remained mostly focal to the left lower lobe but some rhonchi were noted bilaterally. Azithromycin was initiated, given the known high community prevalence. Multiplex respiratory PCR results were positive for M pneumoniae. On day 3 of azithromycin treatment, he had an exacerbation of his underlying reactive airways requiring albuterol and steroids; however, the subsequent day, he was weaned off respiratory support.
Discussion
M pneumoniae is a respiratory pathogen causing mild disease in most pediatric patients. Serious and atypical clinical presentations are possible. In this case series, we describe 3 pediatric patients with unusual presentations of M pneumoniae infection seen within a 6-week period. These cases presented during increased numbers of positive diagnostic respiratory multiplex PCR testing. Following the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a shift in the incidence and timing of respiratory infections.5,6
As with other infections, the increased incidence of M pneumonia infections appears related to infection control measures used during the pandemic and changes in herd immunity.7 Before the pandemic, the incidence of M pneumoniae worldwide was 8.6%, decreasing to 1.7% during the pandemic and followed by a resurgence in fall 2023.8-10
It is possible, as with other respiratory viruses, that the increased number of cases could be related in part to increased use of multiplex respiratory PCR.11 Regardless, the cases reported here had no other positive etiology, and clinical presentation resolved with macrolide treatment.
Figure 4 shows increased positive tests for M pneumoniae by multiplex respiratory PCR in our community. Among these cases, we saw an increase in atypical and more severe diseases. Our cases illustrate this trend.
M pneumoniae is not a common cause of laryngitis. There are case reports in the literature of pseudomembranous necrotizing laryngotracheobronchitis due to M pneumoniae.
These patients may have a similar presentation of cough, shortness of breath, and hoarseness but with high fevers. In reported cases, M pneumoniae is identified on PCR examination from a bronchial aspirate.12 Given the degree of swelling and airway narrowing in patient 1 described above, a laryngoscopy was deemed unsafe, so direct infectious studies from the larynx were not obtained.
Rashes have been described in cases of M pneumoniae infection. More recently, in 2015, M pneumoniae–induced rash and mucositis (MIRM) was described as a clinical entity.13 Patient 2 had a bullous rash compatible with the vesiculobullous rash described in MIRM. However, he lacked mucosal involvement. Bullous rash secondary to M pneumoniae has been rarely reported,14 but lack of mucosal involvement can lead to underdiagnosis. Severe cases of rash and mucositis require admission, and treatment modalities usually include steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin. Our patient was clinically stable, appeared well, and did not require hospital admission or treatment with immune modulators. He was treated only with an oral macrolide.
M pneumoniae pneumonia (MPP) is commonly associated with atypical pneumonia, with diffuse, peribronchial, and perivascular interstitial infiltrates on chest x-ray. One-third of patients with MPP present with airspace consolidation. Other patterns include reticulonodular opacities or masslike opacities.15 Although MPP is often a mild and self-limited disease, approximately 12% of children with it progress to more severe lung disease, including pleural effusions, pulmonary embolism, and/or necrotizing pneumonia, as well as serious extrapulmonary complications.16 Macrolides are the first-line treatment for this pathogen and are appropriate for treating children with more severe diseases. Although macrolide-resistant M pneumoniae and refractory MPP (persistent symptoms despite an appropriate antibiotic treatment course) have been reported, recent publications estimate resistance in the US is less than 10%.17-19
Conclusion
This pediatric case series describes 3 atypical clinical presentations of M pneumoniae and highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for M pneumoniae, especially in the context of increased community incidence. In many cases, identification and appropriate treatment can decrease progression to more severe disease. Continued vigilance is necessary given the changing patterns of M pneumoniae and other respiratory pathogens in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Click here for more from the January/February, 2025 issue of Contemporary Pediatrics.
References:
1. Committee on Infectious Diseases, American Academy of Pediatrics. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and other Mycoplasma species infections. In: Kimberlin DW, Banerjee R, Barnett ED, Lynfield R, Sawyer MH, eds. Red Book: 2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 33rd ed. American Academy of Pediatrics; 2024. Accessed September 1, 2024. doi.org/10.1542/9781610027359-S3_012_010
2. Krafft C, Christy C. Mycoplasma pneumonia in children and adolescents. Pediatr Rev. 2020;41(1):12-19. doi:10.1542/pir.2018-0016
3. Shah SS. Mycoplasma pneumoniae. In: Long SS, Prober CG, Fischer MM, eds. Principles and Practice of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2022:1041-1045.e4. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-75608-2.00196-8
4. Edens C, Clopper BR, DeVies J, et al. Notes from the field: reemergence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children and adolescents after the COVID-19 pandemic, United States, 2018-2024. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024;73(7):149-151. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7307a3
5. Aboulhosn A, Sanson MA, Vega LA, et al. Increases in group A streptococcal infections in the pediatric population in Houston, TX, 2022. Clin Infect Dis. 2023;77(3):351-354. doi:10.1093/cid/ciad197
6. Mohapatra RK, Kutikuppala LVS, Mishra S, Tuglo LS, Dhama K. Rising global incidence of invasive group A streptococcus infection and scarlet fever in the COVID-19 era - our knowledge thus far. Int J Surg. 2023;109(3):639-640. doi:10.1097/js9.0000000000000232
7. Zhang D, Feng Z, Wang Q. Prevention and treatment of Mycoplasma pneumoniae requires long-term attention. Infect Dis Immun. 2024;4(2):58-60. doi:10.1097/id9.0000000000000118
8. Oster Y, Michael-Gayego A, Rivkin M, Levinson L, Wolf DG, Nir-Paz R. Decreased prevalence rate of respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: possible role for public health containment measures? Clin Microbiol Infect. –2020;27(5):811-812. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2020.12.007
9. Meyer Sauteur PM, Chalker VJ, Berger C, Nir-Paz R, Beeton ML; ESGMAC and the ESGMAC–MyCOVID study group. Mycoplasma pneumoniae beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: where is it? Lancet Microbe. 2022;3(12):e897. doi:10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00190-2
10. Gong C, Huang F, Suo L, et al. Increase of respiratory illnesses among children in Beijing, China, during the autumn and winter of 2023. Euro Surveill. 2024;29(2):2300704. doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.2.2300704
11. Petros BA, Milliren CE, Sabeti PC, Ozonoff A. Increased pediatric respiratory syncytial virus case counts following the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 can be attributed to changes in testing. Clin Infect Dis. 2024;78(6):1707-1717. doi:10.1093/cid/ciae140
12. Lei W, Fei-Zhou Z, Jing C, Shu-Xian L, Xi-Ling W, Lan-Fang T. Pseudomembranous necrotizing laryngotracheobronchitis due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae: a case report and literature review. BMC Infect Dis. 2022;22(1):183. doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07160-5
13. Canavan TN, Mathes EF, Frieden I, Shinkai K. Mycoplasma pneumoniae–induced rash and mucositis as a syndrome distinct from Stevens-Johnson syndrome and erythema multiforme: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;72(2):239-245. doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2014.06.026
14. Bhoopalan SV, Chawla V, Hogan MB, Wilson NW, Das SU. Bullous skin manifestations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection: a case series. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep. 2017;5(3):2324709617727759. doi:10.1177/2324709617727759
15. Lanao AE, Chakraborty RK, Pearson-Shaver AL. Mycoplasma infections. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Updated August 7, 2023. Accessed September 1, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536927
16. Zhang X, Sun R, Jia W, Li P, Song C. Clinical characteristics of lung consolidation with Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia and risk factors for Mycoplasma pneumoniae necrotizing pneumonia in children. Infect Dis Ther. 2024;13(2):329-343. doi:10.1007/s40121-023-00914-x
17. Kutty PK, Jain S, Taylor TH, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae among children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(1):5-12. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy419
18. Lanata MM, Wang H, Everhart K, Moore-Clingenpeel M, Ramilo O, Leber A. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections in children, Ohio, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27(6):1588-1597. doi:10.3201/eid2706.203206
19. Kim K, Jung S, Kim M, Park S, Yang HJ, Lee E. Global trends in the proportion of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2220949. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20949