Expanded analyses from the phase 3 sunRIZE trial of ersodetug (Rezolute, Inc.) in patients with congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) demonstrate consistent improvements in glycemic control across multiple continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)–based endpoints compared with placebo, according to data presented at the Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) 2026 Annual Meeting.¹
The findings come despite the trial's failure to meet its primary endpoint, raising questions about the path forward for this first-in-class therapy in a disease with limited treatment options.
Key facts
- Drug: Ersodetug (monoclonal antibody)
- Class: Allosteric insulin receptor antagonist
- Indication: Congenital hyperinsulinism
- Trial: sunRIZE (RZ358-301), phase 3
- Primary endpoint: Not met (SMBG-based)
- CGM outcomes: Nominally significant improvements
- OLE retention: 57 of 59 completers ongoing
- FDA status: Data submission requested
- Geography: Multinational (12+ countries)
"These results underscore our confidence in the potential of ersodetug to transform the HI treatment landscape and embolden our mission to achieve alignment with FDA on an acceptable path to approval in this indication, so that we can keep delivering ersodetug to patients and families living with congenital HI," said Brian Roberts, MD, chief medical officer of Rezolute.
The sunRIZE study (RZ358-301) was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trial enrolling 63 participants aged 3 months to 45 years across more than a dozen countries.¹ Patients with congenital HI who continued to experience hypoglycemia on standard of care (SOC) were randomized to receive ersodetug at 5 or 10 mg/kg or matched placebo, administered as add-on therapy. Dosing occurred every other week during a loading phase and then every 4 weeks during a 6-month controlled treatment period.
The primary endpoint—change from baseline in average weekly hypoglycemia events measured by self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) — was not met. Rezolute attributed this failure to functional unblinding of the SMBG endpoint, which the company believes led to divergent glucose-modifying behaviors between treatment groups and a pronounced placebo effect.
However, the expanded analyses presented at PES focused on CGM-based outcomes, which showed nominally statistically significant improvements across multiple timepoints. In the full analysis set (FAS), ersodetug-treated patients demonstrated reductions of greater than 50% in average daily percent time in hypoglycemia compared with placebo. In the per-protocol set (PPS), these reductions ranged from approximately 60% to 80%. Average weekly hypoglycemia events by CGM were reduced by approximately 50% to 65% in the FAS and 50% to 80% in the PPS. Additionally, exposure to normoglycemia (area under the curve for blood glucose 70-180 mg/dL) increased by approximately 25% to 50%, and average blood glucose levels rose by approximately 10 to 15 mg/dL compared with placebo.¹