Two states join New Jersey lawsuit against SCHIP restrictions

Article

The attorney generals of Connecticut and Massachusetts filed a joint amicus brief in the US District Court in support of New Jersey's challenge to new restrictions for the State Children's Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP).

The attorney generals of Connecticut and Massachusetts filed a joint amicus brief in the US District Court in support of New Jersey's challenge to new restrictions for the State Children's Health Insurance Programs (SCHIP).

The restrictions, which need to be implemented by August 2008, were announced to all 50 states in an August 17, 2007, letter from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The letter informed states of several new requirements for children in families who earn between 250% and 300% of the federal poverty level to receive federal reimbursement for health coverage.

For example, before expanding coverage to these families, states must prove that at least 95% of eligible children whose parents earn 200% of the federal poverty line or below are enrolled in either SCHIP or Medicaid. In addition, states must implement a one-year waiting period before children are allowed to enroll in SCHIP.

New Jersey has claimed that the CMS letter is a violation of the Administrative Procedure Act.

Newsletter

Access practical, evidence-based guidance to support better care for our youngest patients. Join our email list for the latest clinical updates.

Recent Videos
David Brousseau, MD, highlights impact of timely opioid dosing in pediatric sickle cell pain
Richard Bermudes, MD, on screen-related addictions and youth mental health
© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.